Skip to content

Interpreting Genomic Language Models using Sparse Autoencoders

Akira A Nair, Jaehyun Joo, Jonghyun Lee, Lina Takemaru, Yidi Huang, Manu Shivakumar, Matthew Eric Lee, Jaesik Kim

ICML 2026 regular

Abstract (source: OpenReview · © authors)

Genomic language models (gLMs) achieve strong performance across genomic prediction tasks, but their internal biological representations remain poorly understood. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as an interpretability tool in vision and natural language models, yet their applicability to gLMs remains unexplored. We present a systematic study of SAE-based interpretability for gLMs, introducing a diverse benchmark of human genomic annotations and a suite of genome-tailored interpretability metrics. Using Evo2 as a primary case study, we show that SAE features, particularly those from intermediate layers, are more interpretable than raw model embeddings across 42/55 (76%) of our genomic concept evaluations, with 26 of them having an F1 score greater than 0.7. We further find that interpretability depends on SAE training data properties such as evolutionary proximity and context length. Finally, to organize semantically related genomic concepts learned by an SAE, we develop a graph-based representation method that outperforms the baseline approach of using SAE model weights. We demonstrate how our framework can extend SAEs as a powerful approach for not only better understanding gLMs but also for adopting them in disease-driven genomic explorations.

Keywords

Genomic Language Models Evo2 Interpretability Genomics Sparse Autoencoders Representation Learning Machine Learning ICML

Metadata from BioTender-max/icml2026-ai-bio (CC0-1.0). Phở does not host any PDF; links point back to the source.

Related

Genomics

DNACHUNKER: Learnable Tokenization for DNA Language Models

Taewon Kim, Jihwan Shin, Hyomin Kim, Youngmok Jung +4

DNA language models are increasingly used to represent genomic sequence, yet their effectiveness depends critically on how raw nucleotides are converted into model inputs. Unlike…

Genomics

GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare

Daria Ledneva, Mikhail Nuridinov, Denis Kuznetsov

Progress in genomic foundation models is difficult to assess due to fragmented benchmarks, incompatible evaluation protocols, and task-specific reporting. As a result, claims of…