Interpreting Genomic Language Models using Sparse Autoencoders
Akira A Nair, Jaehyun Joo, Jonghyun Lee, Lina Takemaru, Yidi Huang, Manu Shivakumar, Matthew Eric Lee, Jaesik Kim
ICML 2026 regular
Abstract (source: OpenReview · © authors)
Genomic language models (gLMs) achieve strong performance across genomic prediction tasks, but their internal biological representations remain poorly understood. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as an interpretability tool in vision and natural language models, yet their applicability to gLMs remains unexplored. We present a systematic study of SAE-based interpretability for gLMs, introducing a diverse benchmark of human genomic annotations and a suite of genome-tailored interpretability metrics. Using Evo2 as a primary case study, we show that SAE features, particularly those from intermediate layers, are more interpretable than raw model embeddings across 42/55 (76%) of our genomic concept evaluations, with 26 of them having an F1 score greater than 0.7. We further find that interpretability depends on SAE training data properties such as evolutionary proximity and context length. Finally, to organize semantically related genomic concepts learned by an SAE, we develop a graph-based representation method that outperforms the baseline approach of using SAE model weights. We demonstrate how our framework can extend SAEs as a powerful approach for not only better understanding gLMs but also for adopting them in disease-driven genomic explorations.
Keywords
Metadata from BioTender-max/icml2026-ai-bio (CC0-1.0). Phở does not host any PDF; links point back to the source.
Related
DNACHUNKER: Learnable Tokenization for DNA Language Models
Taewon Kim, Jihwan Shin, Hyomin Kim, Youngmok Jung +4
DNA language models are increasingly used to represent genomic sequence, yet their effectiveness depends critically on how raw nucleotides are converted into model inputs. Unlike…
Bimodal masked language modeling for bulk RNA-seq and DNA methylation representation learning
Maxence Gélard, Hakim Benkirane, Thomas Pierrot, Guillaume Richard +1
Oncologists are increasingly relying on multiple modalities to model the complexity of diseases. Within this landscape, transcriptomic and epigenetic data have proven to be…
GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare
Daria Ledneva, Mikhail Nuridinov, Denis Kuznetsov
Progress in genomic foundation models is difficult to assess due to fragmented benchmarks, incompatible evaluation protocols, and task-specific reporting. As a result, claims of…